Botulinum toxin therapy for management of phantom and residual limb pain following amputation: A systematic review.

Chronic pain following amputation is debilitating. Due to its mechanisms in modulating muscle contraction and pain, botulinum toxin has been investigated as a treatment option for phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of botulinum toxin injection in the management of PLP and RLP following major limb amputation using a systematic review of the literature. The databases Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched from inception through October 30, 2023. The search identified 50 articles; 37 underwent full-text review, and 11 were included in the final review. Eighty-nine individuals with pain were investigated by the included studies; 53 had RLP and 63 had PLP. There was significant variation in botulinum toxin type, injection method, and dosage. Twenty-one (53.9%) and 27 (64.3%) participants had improvement in PLP and RLP following botulinum toxin injection, respectively. Therefore, there is potential for use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of PLP and RLP. However, due to the minimal number of studies, small sample sizes, and heterogenous methodologies, our ability to conclude with certainty the efficacy of botulinum toxin injection on the treatment of PLP and RLP following amputation is limited.

Association between balance confidence and basic walking abilities in people with unilateral transtibial lower-limb amputations: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Falls are common for people with lower-limb amputations (PLLA). Low balance confidence is also prevalent, is worse in PLLA not reporting walking automaticity, and is known to negatively affect prosthesis use, social engagement, and quality of life. Moreover, walking with a prosthesis requires continuous attention. Low balance confidence may act as a distractor imposing an additional cognitive load on the already cognitively demanding task of walking with a prosthesis. METHODS: Adults with unilateral, transtibial amputations were recruited. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale quantified balance confidence. The L Test assessed basic walking abilities under single-task (ST) (usual) and dual-task (DT) (walking while counting backwards) conditions. The relative change in gait and secondary task performance between conditions (ie, DT cost) was calculated. Separate multivariable linear regressions examined the association of balance confidence on the L Test. RESULTS: Forty-four PLLA (56.6 ± 12.6 years) participated. An independent association of the ABC to ST ( P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.56) and DT ( P = 0.008, R 2 = 0.43) L Test performance was observed. A 1% ABC increase was related with a 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.14) and 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.06) second reduction with the ST and DT L Test, respectively. No association to DT cost was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Balance confidence influences basic walking abilities yet does not modulate the added cognitive load associated with DT. Interventions that address balance confidence may be beneficial throughout rehabilitation. This research is novel and offers the possibility for alternative avenues for focus in rehabilitation and falls prevention in a population at high risk for falls.

Association between measures of cognitive function on physical function in novice users of a lower limb prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is prevalent in people with lower limb amputations (PLLA) and is associated with adverse outcomes, such as falls and worse rehabilitation outcomes. Physical function tests are essential to examine abilities; however, no research in PLLA has clarified the magnitude of cognitive demands amongst available tests in users novice at walking with a prosthesis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there an association between cognitive and physical function for PLLA novice at walking with a prosthesis? METHODS: People from inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation were recruited. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 50 years, unilateral transtibial amputation and able to walk independently. Gait velocity and the L Test under single-task (usual) and dual-task (walking while counting backwards) conditions assessed functional mobility. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) examined dynamic balance. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Trail Making Test (TMT-B) assessed global cognitive status and executive function, respectively. Multivariable linear regressions evaluated the association of cognition on physical function. RESULTS: Twenty-two people participated (age: 62.3 ± 8.9 years, male: 68.18%). The mean MoCA score was 26.23 ± 2.90. A 1-point MoCA increase was independently associated with faster gait velocity (cm/s) [single-task: 5.45 (95%CI: 2.35-8.54, AdjR2 =0.46), dual-task: 5.04 (95%CI: 1.33-8.75, AdjR2 =0.20) and a quicker L Test (s) [single-task: - 4.75 (95%CI: 7.22-2.28, AdjR2 =0.45), dual-task: - 5.27 (95%CI: 8.74-1.80, AdjR2 =0.38)]. A 1-second TMT-B increase was also independently associated with worse L Test performance [single-task: 0.21 s (95%CI: 0.03-0.39, AdjR2 =0.20), dual-task: 0.29 s (95%CI: 0.06-0.51, AdjR2 =0.30)]. No association was observed between MoCA or TMT-B on the FSST (p > 0.13). SIGNIFICANCE: Better global cognitive function and executive function were independently associated with faster gait velocity and improved functional mobility, but not dynamic balance. The present study demonstrates a unique relationship between cognition and physical function that warrants further research on the cognitive demands among clinical tests of physical function in PLLA.

Pregnancy After Amputation: A Systematic Review of Pregnancy Experiences for Women With Lower Extremity Amputations.

ABSTRACT: Pregnancy could affect the mobility of women with lower extremity limb loss, deficiency, or amputations. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the pregnancy-related experiences, including prosthesis, gait aid, and mobility outcomes, of women with lower extremity limb loss, deficiency, or amputations. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched for all relevant English-language articles describing pregnancy experiences of women with lower extremity limb loss, deficiency, or amputations. Data extracted were age, amputation level and etiology, obstetrical history, prosthesis and/or gait aid use before, during, and after pregnancy, and pregnancy-related complications. Risk of bias was assessed using applicable CLARITY tools. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Among 399 retrieved studies, 24 met inclusion criteria describing 31 pregnancies in 25 women. All were case series/reports with high risk of bias. All women had acquired lower extremity limb loss, deficiency, or amputations. Sixteen women had hemipelvectomy (64%) and 4 had transfemoral amputations (16%). Three women used a prosthesis, 5 did not, and use was not described for 17 (68%). Prosthesis or gait aid use changed in 2 pregnancies, did not change in 6, and was not specified in 23 (74%). Available cases are likely not representative; additional research is required to characterize the impact of pregnancy on women with lower extremity limb loss, deficiency, or amputations.

Rehabilitation outcomes after major lower limb amputation in the oldest old: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Because the population grows older and the burden of chronic disease increases, many individuals will undergo major lower limb amputation (LLA) at advanced ages. There is a scarcity of literature focusing on the outcomes of rehabilitation for people who acquire LLA at 80 years of age and older. OBJECTIVES: To determine the scope of empirical evidence regarding prosthetic rehabilitation for newly acquired LLA in the oldest old (≥80 years of age). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: The databases CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched from inception through June 6, 2020 (PROSPERO: #CRD 42020188623). Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts for inclusion. Inclusion criteria, LLA of any etiology at the transtibial level or above, those who were ≥80 years of age at the time of amputation, and had rehabilitation outcomes reported. RESULTS: Of 11,738 articles identified from databases, 117 underwent full-text review and 10 met inclusion criteria. Multiple rehabilitation outcomes were assessed by the selected studies, including general outcomes, prosthetic-related outcomes, and functional abilities. Individuals ≥80 years of age were able to successfully use a prosthesis, discharged home, and performed activities independently or with support. However, increased age was negatively associated with prosthesis fitting and rehabilitation success was not uniform in some participants. CONCLUSIONS: The oldest old with major LLA can be successful in prosthetic rehabilitation. Age alone should not disqualify individuals from assessment or participation in an amputee rehabilitation program. More research is needed to better understand the rehabilitation outcomes in this population of people with LLA.

Association Between Changes in Subjective and Objective Measures of Mobility in People With Lower Limb Amputations After Inpatient Rehabilitation.

Functional recovery for people with lower limb amputations is quantified using objective or subjective measures of performance. In this brief report, the prospective relationship between objective and subjective mobility after rehabilitation was evaluated in people with lower limb amputations. Adults undergoing inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation for a first unilateral transtibial or transfemoral level lower limb amputation were recruited. Assessment times: discharge and 4-mo follow-up. Gait velocity and the L Test under single- and dual-task conditions measured objective mobility. The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (section 4 and question 5b) measured subjective mobility. Paired t tests and Pearson correlation analysis evaluated change over time and the association between mobility types, respectively. Twenty-one people with lower limb amputations (61.6 ± 8.2 yrs) participated. Gait velocity significantly improved (single- and dual-task: P < 0.001). L Test significantly improved for single-task (P = 0.002) but not dual-task conditions. No statistically significant Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire changes were observed. One subjective mobility question (sidewalk walking) correlated with objective mobility at follow-up (L Test single- and dual-task: r = -0.77; P < 0.001). Objective mobility improved after discharge; however, subjective reporting had no change. Lack of association may represent a mismatch between quantitative outcomes and subjective self-assessment. Both subjective and objective measures of mobility should be collected to provide a holistic picture of clinical and patient-relevant outcomes in people with lower limb amputations.

Evaluating knowledge of falls risk factors and falls prevention strategies among lower extremity amputees after inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation: a prospective study.

Purpose: Falls are prevalent among people with lower extremity amputations. A knowledge of risk factors is important in preventing falls, though no research has evaluated patient understanding of falls in this population. The study objective was to evaluate knowledge of falls risk factors and falls prevention strategies at discharge and 4-months after inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation.Methods: Participants completed a falls questionnaires with four sections: (1) falls during rehabilitation and after discharge, (2) falls self-efficacy using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, (3) knowledge of falls risk factors, and (4) falls prevention strategies. Questionnaire responses were quantified using means and standard deviations or frequencies and percentages. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale and the knowledge of falls risk factors, and using chi-square analyses for fall prevention strategies.Results: Twenty-seven individuals (aged 62.6 ± 8.4; 55.6% male) were included. Unsafe or risky behaviours and not paying attention to surroundings were perceived as the top two falls risk factors. Although these factors are modifiable, only 5.9% of participants listed preventative behavioural modifications. No significant differences were found in Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale scores (p = 0.404) or knowledge of falls risk factors (p = 0.361) between discharge and follow-up.Conclusion: This study highlights a gap between knowledge of falls risk factors and the application of knowledge to prevent falls. Follow-up data suggest that lived experience does not affect the knowledge of falls risk factors.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONFalls and falls prevention are an important health concern for those with lower extremityamputations and should be addressed during the rehabilitation process.Balance confidence among individuals with lower extremity amputations is low, indicating that this population is at an increased falls risk and may require intervention to prevent falls.Rehabilitation programs should encourage all forms of falls prevention modifications and strategies, such as behavioural modifications, physical activity and environmental modifications.There is a gap between knowledge of falls risk factors and how to apply this to prevent falls, which may be a target for rehabilitation.

Reliability, validity, and agreement of the short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in people with lower extremity amputations.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians use the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale to understand balance confidence. A short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, was developed using the six most difficult tasks from the original Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale; however, short-form the short-form scale psychometrics and agreement with the original scale have yet to be explored in people with lower extremity amputations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative and absolute reliability, construct validity, and agreement of the short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. STUDY DESIGN: Test-retest with a 2-week interval. METHODS: Analysis for relative reliability and internal consistency was intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α, respectively. Absolute reliability was measured using standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. Bland-Altman plots measured agreement between scales. Construct validity was evaluated against the L Test using a Pearson-product moment correlation. RESULTS: The short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92) and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91) scales had excellent relative reliability. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency. Worse absolute reliability was observed in the short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. Construct validity against the L Test was confirmed. Bland-Altman plots indicated poor agreement between scales. CONCLUSION: Both scales exhibit excellent relative reliability and good internal consistency and construct validity. Poor agreement between short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence and Activities-specific Balance Confidence indicates the scales should not be used interchangeably. Inadequate absolute reliability of the short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale suggests the Activities-specific Balance Confidence should be the balance confidence scale of choice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Balance confidence is an important metric for our understanding of rehabilitation and community re-integration in people with lower extremity amputations. Due to inferior absolute reliability and a lack of appropriate items composing the short-form Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, the full-scale Activities-specific Balance Confidence is recommended for the assessment of balance confidence in this population.

Cognition Predicts Mobility Change in Lower Extremity Amputees Between Discharge From Rehabilitation and 4-Month Follow-up: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) the effect of task (single and dual task), time (discharge and 4mo), and their interaction for mobility; (2) task prioritization during dual-task testing; and (3) the association between cognition on change in mobility between discharge from rehabilitation and 4 months' follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: People with lower extremity amputations (N=22) were consecutively recruited at discharge from an inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation program. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait velocity and the L Test of Functional Mobility, single and dual task (serial subtractions by 3), were the primary outcomes. Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Trail Making Test quantified cognition as secondary outcomes. Repeated measures analysis of variance evaluated the effects of task (single task and dual task) and time (at discharge and 4 months' follow-up) and their interaction on each outcome. A performance-resource operating characteristic graph evaluated gait and cognitive task prioritization. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the association between cognition and change in mobility over time. RESULTS: No significant interactions between task and time were found (all P>.121) for L Test and gait velocity. The L Test single task (P=.001) and dual task (P=.004) improved over time. Gait velocity improved over time for both single task and dual task (P<.001). Dual-task performance was slower than single-task performances at each time point. The Trail Making Test B was independently associated with the change in dual-task L Test (P=.012), and single-task (P=.003) and dual-task (P=.006) gait velocity at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Gait velocity and L Test single and dual task improved over time. No significant interactions indicated that cognitive task did not differentially affect performance over time. Lower executive function scores at discharge were independently associated with lower gains in all gait velocity and dual-task L Test outcomes at follow-up.

Relationship between body image and physical functioning following rehabilitation for lower-limb amputation.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate change in body image and the association between body image at discharge and mobility 4 months after rehabilitation. A prospective cohort comprising adults older than or equal to 50 years of age undergoing rehabilitation for first major lower-limb amputation at an inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation program were assessed at discharge and 4 months after rehabilitation. Paired t-tests compared total Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), gait velocity, and L-test scores between discharge (T1) and 4 months (T2). Multivariable linear regression assessed relationship between ABIS scores and mobility. Nineteen participants completed assessments (mean±SD age=60.86±6.85 years; 63.20% male patients). Body image changed from T1 (43.58±7.83) to T2 (48.26±12.21), but was not statistically significant (P=0.063). Mobility significantly improved at T2. ABIS scores at T1 were not associated with mobility at T2. Mobility improved after discharge but was not related to body image at T1. Additional research on the impact of body image perception on patient outcomes after rehabilitation is needed.

A framework for secondary cognitive and motor tasks in dual-task gait testing in people with mild cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Cognition is a key factor in the regulation of normal walking and dual-task gait assessment is an accepted method to evaluate the relationship. The objective of this study was to create a framework for task complexity of concurrent motor and cognitive tasks with gait in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Community-dwelling people with MCI (n = 41, mean age = 76.20 ± 7.65 years) and cognitively normal controls (n = 41, mean age = 72.10 ± 3.80 years) participated in this study. Gait velocity was collected using an instrumented walkway under one single task and six combined tasks of motor and cognitive activities. The cognitive cost was the difference between the single gait task and each of the concurrent motor and cognitive challenges. A repeated two-way measure ANOVA assessed the effect of cognitive group and walking test condition for each gait task test. RESULTS: Gait velocity was significantly slower in the MCI group under all tasks. For both groups, the concurrent motor task of carrying a glass of water conferred a challenge not different from the cognitive task of counting backwards by ones. Performance of the complex cognitive task of serial seven subtractions reduced gait velocity in both groups, but produced a greater change in the MCI group (31.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Not all concurrent tasks challenge cognition-motor interaction equivalently. This study has created a framework of task difficulty which allows for the translation of dual-task test conditions to future research and clinical practice to ensure the accuracy of assessing patient deficits and risk.

Comparing the Effects of Dual-Task Gait Testing in New and Established Ambulators With Lower Extremity Amputations.

BACKGROUND: Gait is a complex process that involves coordinating motor and sensory systems through higher-order cognitive processes. Walking with a prosthesis after lower extremity amputation challenges these processes. However, the factors that influence the cognitive-motor interaction in gait among lower extremity amputees has not been evaluated. To assess the interaction of cognition and mobility, individuals must be evaluated using the dual-task paradigm. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of etiology and time with prosthesis on dual-task performance in those with lower extremity amputations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient and inpatient amputee clinics at an academic rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four individuals (aged 58.20±12.27 years; 74.5% male) were stratified into 3 groups; 1 group of new prosthetic ambulators with transtibial amputations (NewPA) and 2 groups of established ambulators: transtibial amputations of vascular etiology (TTA-vas), transtibial amputations of nonvascular etiology (TTA-nonvas). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to complete the L Test measured functional mobility under single and dual-task conditions. A serial arithmetic task (subtraction by 3s) was paired with the L Test to create the dual-task test condition. Single-task performance on the cognitive arithmetic task was also recorded. Dual-task costs (DTCs) were calculated for performance on the cognitive and gait tasks. Analysis of variance determined differences between groups. A performance-resource operating characteristic (POC) graph was used to graphically display DTCs. RESULTS: Gait performance was worse under dual-task conditions for all groups. Gait was significantly slower under dual-task conditions for the TTA-vas (P < .001), TTA-nonvas (P < .001), and NewPA groups (P < .001). However, there was no between-group difference for gait DTC. The 3 groups tested did not differ in the amount of cognitive DTC (DTCcog). Dual-task conditions also had a negative impact on cognitive task performance for the TTA-nonvas (P = .02) and NewPA groups (P < .001). The TTA-vas group had a slight improvement during dual-task conditions and has a positive DTCcog as a result (P = .04). However, no between-group differences were seen for DTCcog. The POC graph demonstrated that many individuals had a decrease in performance on both tasks; however, the gait task was prioritized for the majority (56.2%) of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive distractions while walking pose challenges to individuals regardless of etiology, level of amputation, or time with the prosthesis. These findings highlight that individuals are at risk for adverse events when performing multiple tasks while walking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Dual-task related gait changes in individuals with trans-tibial lower extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: The improvement of gait and mobility are major rehabilitation goals following lower extremity amputations. However, when living in the community many daily activities require the multitasking of motor and cognitive tasks. The dual-task paradigm can be used to evaluate the concurrent performance of mobility and cognitive tasks. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of dual-task gait testing in older adults with trans-tibial amputations. METHODS: Twenty-four people (15 men, mean age ±â€¯SD, 62.72 ±â€¯8.59) with trans-tibial amputation walked on an electronic walkway at i) self-selected comfortable pace and ii) self-selected comfortable pace while counting backwards by threes from a number randomly selected between 100 and 150. Cognitive performance, in the form of corrected response rate, was also evaluated as a single-task. RESULTS: The dual-task testing produced poorer performance in velocity (single-task = 58.15 ±â€¯23.16 cm/s, dual-task = 50.92 ±â€¯21.16 cm/s, p = 0.008), cadence (single-task = 76.65 ±â€¯15.84 steps/min, dual-task = 67.85 ±â€¯15.76 steps/min, p = 0.002) and stride time (single-task = 1094 ±â€¯458.28 ms, dual-task = 1241.44 ±â€¯513.73 ms, p = 0.005). Step length, stance time and single limb support time symmetry were also affected, such that less time was spent on the amputated limb during the dual-task testing. SIGNIFICANCE: Dual-task testing demonstrated interference resulting in a poor performance in both gait and cognitive performance in trans-tibial amputees. Further research is suggested to evaluate the change in cognition-mobility effects over time and the relationship of this value to future adverse events such as falls and successful outcomes such as community ambulation and reintegration.

Determining Reliability of a Dual-Task Functional Mobility Protocol for Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative and absolute reliability of a dual-task functional mobility assessment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Academic rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=60) with lower extremity amputation attending an outpatient amputee clinic (mean age, 58.21±12.59y; 18, 80% male) who were stratified into 3 groups: (1) transtibial amputation of vascular etiology (n=20); (2) transtibial amputation of nonvascular etiology (n=20); and (3) transfemoral or bilateral amputation of any etiology (n=20). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to complete the L Test measured functional mobility under single- and dual-task conditions. The addition of a cognitive task (serial subtractions by 3's) created dual-task conditions. Single-task performance on the cognitive task was also reported. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) measured relative reliability; SEM and minimal detectable change with a 95% confidence interval (MDC95) measured absolute reliability. Bland-Altman plots measured agreement between assessments. RESULTS: Relative reliability results were excellent for all 3 groups. Values for the dual-task L Test for those with transtibial amputation of vascular etiology (n=20; mean age, 60.36±7.84y; 19, 90% men) were ICC=.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], .94-.99), SEM=1.36 seconds, and MDC95=3.76 seconds; for those with transtibial amputation of nonvascular etiology (n=20; mean age, 55.85±14.08y; 17, 85% men), values were ICC=.93 (95% CI, .80-.98), SEM=1.34 seconds, and MDC95=3.71 seconds; and for those with transfemoral or bilateral amputation (n=20; mean age, 58.21±14.88y; 13, 65% men), values were ICC=.998 (95% CI, .996-.999), SEM=1.03 seconds, and MDC95=2.85 seconds. Bland-Altman plots indicated that assessments did not vary systematically for each group. CONCLUSIONS: This dual-task assessment protocol achieved approved levels of relative reliability values for the 3 groups tested. This protocol may be used clinically or in research settings to assess the interaction between cognition and functional mobility in the population with lower extremity amputation.

MoCA Domain Score Analysis and Relation to Mobility Outcomes in Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputees.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between cognitive functioning, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and functional outcomes upon discharge from prosthetic rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart audit. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive admissions (N=130; mean age, 66.21±11.19y) with lower extremity amputation of dysvascular etiology. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive status was assessed using the MoCA. The L Test of Functional Mobility (L Test) and the 2-minute walk test were used to estimate functional mobility and walking endurance. RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression analysis, those who scored 2 on the visuospatial/executive functioning (out of 5) and language (out of 3) domains had statistically shorter distances walked on the 2-minute walk test than did those who scored the highest on these MoCA domains. These values were not clinically relevant. Time to complete the L Test for those who scored the lowest on the MoCA domains of visuospatial/executive functioning and delayed recall and 3 on the attention domain (out of 6) was significantly longer than that for those who scored the highest. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with lower extremity amputation have an increased risk of cognitive impairment related to amputation etiology. Lower levels of functioning on MoCA domains of visuospatial/executive functioning, delayed recall, and attention were shown to negatively relate to the rehabilitation outcome of functional mobility, as measured by the L Test.

Association Between Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores and Measures of Functional Mobility in Lower Extremity Amputees After Inpatient Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether scores on a cognitive measure are associated with walking endurance and functional mobility of individuals with transfemoral or transtibial amputations at discharge from inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive admissions (N=176; mean age ± SD, 64.27±13.23y) with transfemoral or transtibial amputation that had data at admission and discharge from an inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation program. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The L Test and the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) were used to estimate functional mobility and walking endurance. RESULTS: The mean ± SD MoCA score was 24.05±4.09 (range, 6-30), and 56.3% of patients had scores <26. MoCA scores had a small positive correlation with the 2MWT (r=.29, P<.01), and a small negative correlation to the L Test (r=-.24, P<.01). In multivariable linear regression, compared with people with the highest MoCA score quartile, there was no difference on the 2MWT, but people in the lowest 2 quartiles took longer to complete the L Test. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment was very prevalent. The association between MoCA and functional mobility was statistically significant. These results highlight the potential for differences on complex motor tasks for individuals with cognitive impairment but does not indicate a need to exclude them from rehabilitation on the basis of cognitive impairment alone.

Impact of Course Configuration on 6-Minute Walk Test Performance of People with Lower Extremity Amputations.

Purpose: The configuration of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) may influence the distance walked and comparability of results among subjects and across programmes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative and absolute test-retest reliability of two 6MWT configurations and to evaluate the agreement between these two configurations in users of lower extremity prosthetics. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to analyze data from 25 subjects completing in-patient prosthetic rehabilitation (mean age 63.12 [SD 13.77] y; 72% male). Two configurations of the 6MWT were examined, and relative and absolute test-retest reliabilities were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate agreement between configurations. Results: The relative test-retest reliability was excellent for both Configuration 1 and Configuration 2: ICC 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98, and ICC 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99, respectively. Comparable values for absolute test-retest reliability were also found. The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a difference of ±63.92 meters between configurations. Conclusions: The two 6MWT configurations had excellent relative and absolute test-retest reliability, but the results from each configuration do not agree sufficiently to make them interchangeable or directly comparable. This highlights the importance of explicitly indicating the test configuration for the 6MWT when reporting results.

Objectif : la configuration du test de marche de 6 minutes (TM6M) peut influencer la distance marchée et la comparabilité des résultats entre sujets et entre programmes. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer la fiabilité relative et absolue test­retest de deux configurations de TM6M et d'évaluer la concordance de ces deux configurations chez des personnes portant une prothèse à un membre inférieur. Méthodologie : les chercheurs ont analysé les données de 25 sujets suivant une réadaptation prothétique à l'hôpital à l'aide d'une méthodologie transversale (âge moyen de 63,12 [ÉT 13,77] ans; 72 % d'hommes). Ils ont examiné les deux configurations du TM6M et calculé la fiabilité relative et absolue test­retest. Ils ont créé un graphique Bland­Altman pour évaluer la concordance entre les configurations. Résultats : la fiabilité relative test­retest était excellente pour les deux configurations. CIC 0,97; IC à 95 % (0,93; 0,98) et CIC 0,97; IC à 95 % (0,94; 0,99), respectivement. Ils ont aussi observé des valeurs comparables pour la fiabilité absolue test­retest. Le graphique Bland­Altman a révélé une différence de±63,92 m entre les deux configurations. Conclusions : les deux configurations du TM6M ont obtenu une excellente fiabilité relative et absolue test­retest. Cependant, les résultats de chaque configuration ne concordent pas suffisamment pour les rendre interchangeables ou directement comparables. Cette constatation fait ressortir l'importance d'indiquer explicitement la configuration du test pour le TM6M au moment de rendre compte des résultats.